mecㆍviewer v1.4 :: RFP_Shaker

KARI PROPRIETARY

Request For Proposal

for

Technical Consulting on

Quad-shaker Vibration System

November 2014

Space Environment Test Team

Korea Aerospace Research Institute

169-84 Gwahangno, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, 305-806, KOREA

Phone : 82(42)860-2562, Fax : 82(42)860-2234

KARI PROPRIETARY

Request For Proposal

for

Technical Consulting on

Quad-shaker Vibration System

IMPORTANT

1. This RFP should be kept in confidentiality and should neither
be copied nor distributed to the third parties.

2. The questions and opinions on this RFP can be asked or
suggested to Korea Aerospace Research Institute before
submission of the proposal.

3. This RFP should be returned to Korea Aerospace Research
Institute with bidder

’s proposal.

4. This RFP shall be legal bind after the contract is awarded
unless the bidder explicitly expresses the differences from the
RFP in the compliance sheet.

November 2014

Space Environment Test Team

Korea Aerospace Research Institute

169-84 Gwahangno, Yuseong-gu

DAEJEON, 305-806, KOREA

Phone : 82(42)860-2562, FAX : 82(42)860-2234

e-mail :acoust@kari.re.kr

2014. 11

Space Environment Test Dept.

Table of Contents

OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................. 2

OVERVIEW OF THE PROJECT ..................................................................................................... 2

REQUISITES OF PARTICIPANTS .................................................................................................. 2

SCOPE OF THE WORK ............................................................................................................... 2

II.

TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS ...................................................................................... 4

QUAD-SHAKER SYSTEM CONFIGURATION ............................................................................... 4

WORK DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................... 5

III.

FORMAT OF PROPOSAL .................................................................................................. 8

2014. 11

Technical Consulting on Quad-shaker Vibration System

Space Environment Test Dept.

I. OVERVIEW

1. Overview of the project

1.1

Korea Aerospace Research Institute

(hereinafter referred to as “KARI”) is located

at Daeduk Research Complex, 140 km south of Seoul.

1.2

KARI has a satellite assembly, integration and test center (hereinafter referred to

as “AITC”) for joint use by corporations and research institutes for the purpose of

the effective development of domestic satellites. And basic facilities and

equipment for satellite assembly and test have been supplied, installed and used.

1.3

To increase the vibration shaker capability and improve the accessibility to

satellite for the safe environmental testing, new guided expander system with

quad shakers will be designed and built.

1.4

The purposes of this project is to supply the technical consulting work to

establish the quad-shaker system of vertical configuration

1.5

All the descriptions in this RFP are minimum requirements and the supplier can

suggest the better one to improve the overall performance and cost. But in this

case, the proposal should clearly indicate the improvements from KARI’s

requirements.

2. Requisites of participants

2.1

The participants shall also have experience of management, integration,

installation and acceptance test for the 3m guided quad-shaker system equipped

with electro dynamic shakers of 640kN.

3. Scope of the work

3.1

The Contractor shall supply the technical consulting work as followings;

 Statement of work and Technical requirements for four-shakers

 Acceptance test for four-shakers

2014. 11

Technical Consulting on Quad-shaker Vibration System

Space Environment Test Dept.

 List of manufacturing Key Inspection points for quad-shakers

 Acceptance test for overall system

 FMECA [Failure modes, effects and critical analysis] analysis on similar

four shakers system

 Review on shaker supplier proposal

 Review on quad-shaker design

2014. 11

Technical Consulting on Quad-shaker Vibration System

Space Environment Test Dept.

II. Technical Requirements

1. Quad-shaker System Configuration

To increase the shaker capability and improve the accessibility to test object, new

guided expander system with quad shakers shall be designed. The head expander

should be designed with magnesium material for reducing the weight. Seismic mass

should be designed to support dynamic load during the vibration test and also supply the

rigid support and load path for the hydraulic bearings. Quad-shakers should be used to

increase the capability. Top level of H/E is designed to same level of facility floor.

Figure 1 Concept for Quad-shaker System

Table 1. Technical requirements for Quad-shaker System

2014. 11

Technical Consulting on Quad-shaker Vibration System

Space Environment Test Dept.

2. Work Description

2.1 WP #1 Statement of work and Technical requirements

for four-shakers

Objective

To generate the SOW and technical requirements for four-

shakers

Activities

Generate the statement of work for four shakers

Generate the technical requirements for shakers

Generate the Amplifier requirements

Generate the system requirements

Generate the maintenance requirements

Generate the guidelines for preparing statement

of work

Outputs

Documentation on SOW and technical requirements

Guidelines for preparing SOW

2.2 WP #2 Acceptance test for four-shakers

Objective

To check the readiness of four-shaker and

review the results of acceptance test

Activities

Generate four shakers acceptance plan on site

Provide acceptance test results of similar system

Outputs

Four shakers acceptance test procedure

Similar four shakers acceptance test result report

2014. 11

Technical Consulting on Quad-shaker Vibration System

Space Environment Test Dept.

2.3 WP #3 List of manufacturing Key Inspection points for quad-

shakers

Objective

To check the Key inspection points for quad-shakers

Activities

Generate the list of manufacturing key inspection

points for shakers

Outputs

List of manufacturing key inspection points

2.4 WP #4 Acceptance test for overall system in KARI

Objective

To check the readiness of overall system

Activities

Generate the list of manufacturing key inspection

points for overall system

Generate the overall system acceptance test

procedure

Provide similar system acceptance test results report

Outputs

Overall system acceptance test procedure

Similar system acceptance test result report

2014. 11

Technical Consulting on Quad-shaker Vibration System

Space Environment Test Dept.

2.5 WP#5 FMECA analysis on KARI quad-shaker system

Objective

To check the safety logic for overall system

Activities

Provide similar four shakers system FMECA report

Outputs

Similar four shaker system FMECA report

2.6 WP#6 Review on shaker supplier proposal

Objective

To review on shaker supplier proposal

Activities

Review the shaker supplier proposal

Outputs

Review report on shaker proposal

2.7 WP#7 Review on quad-shaker design

Objective

To review on quad-shaker design

Activities

Review the overall quad-shaker design

Outputs

Review report on quad-shaker design

2014. 11

Technical Consulting on Quad-shaker Vibration System

Space Environment Test Dept.

III. Format of Proposal

The proposal shall consist of 5 Sections (S).

S 1 : Bidder's Qualification Document

S 2 : Overview and Technical Proposal

S 3 : Work Schedule Plan

S 4 : Documentation

S 5 : Price Proposal

The bidder shall present 6 copies of the proposal. A4 or letter size paper shall be used. The bidder

is requested to strictly follow the following illustrated format (tabular form). This is very

important to compare and evaluate different bidders’ proposal. Consequently, disregard for this

rule may end up with disqualification. Also, well-prepared and well-organized proposal will be

highly appreciated and evaluated. The landscape orientation will be acceptable for tables. The

suggested contents in each WP are minimum requirements and works for reminiscences.

Ambiguous expression will act adversely to the bidder.

Note : The prices which are used in the proposal to calculate the final total and breakdown prices

shall be distinguished from the other prices (e.g. optionally suggested parts by the bidder

or KARI, . . . ) by marking a.p. (applied price) after the prices. In other words, the sum of

a.p. shall be the final total price proposed in the proposal.

(example)

Item

Price

Unit

Subtotal

Item #1

$ 5,000 a.p.

$ 10,000

Item #2

$ 4,000 a.p.

$ 4,000

Item #3

$ 2,000 a.p.

$ 6,000

Total

$ 20,000

2014. 11

Technical Consulting on Quad-shaker Vibration System

Space Environment Test Dept.

S1 : Bidder's Qualification Document

The followings shall be included in this WP.

(a) Bidder's experiences on the prescribed system in this "Request for Proposal" including :

- design/ management/ integration/ installation/ acceptance test

(b) Bidder’s Qualification Evidence Documents to show the capability to perform the technical

consultings.

S2 : Overview and Technical Proposal

Concise and clear expression is required. A long sentence should be broken down into several

sentences. Detailed block diagrams, figures and photos are recommended for clear illustration.

The bidder should prepare tables for the check list to show the bidder's compliance with the

"Request for Proposal [S1 to S5 in Work description]". The bidder’s compliance list shall be

legal bind. This table shall be located in the front of Overview part. The article numbers in the

"Part I. Overview" and "Part II. Technical Requirements" in the RFP should be completely

enumerated in the table. The table format to be followed is as follows:

Check List for "Part I. OVERVIEW", "Part II. TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS", “Part Ⅲ.

Warranty,

Maintenance

and

other

Requirement”

and

“Part

Ⅳ

Terms

and

Conditions”(COMPLIANCE LIST)

ANR

: Article Number in the Part I and Part II in the RFP

Y/N

: Compliance (Yes or No)

CAP

: Corresponding Article number in the bidder's Proposal to ANR

AAM

: Article number of Added Material in the bidder's proposal which is not mentioned in

this RFP

(Exemple)

ANR

Y/N

CAP

Remark

AAM

Remark

I-1.

yes

I-1.1

Ditto

I-2.

yes

I-2.1.1

Ditto

I-2.1.

yes

I-2.1.2.

Ditto

…...

……

II-1.

yes

II-1.1

Ditto

II-2.

yes

II-2.1.2.

Ditto

II-2.1.

yes

II-2.1.3.

Ditto

II-2.1.1.

yes

II-2.1.5.

The specifications look old.
We updated them

2014. 11

Technical Consulting on Quad-shaker Vibration System

Space Environment Test Dept.

N/A

II-2.1.4.

We currently developed a
new method.

II-2.1.2.

yes

II-2.2.1.

Ditto

WP 3 : Work Schedule

The work schedule shall be shown as in detail as possible in chronological way.

- Table for work schedule

WP 4 : Documentation

9.1. Documentation

- document list (contents) to be delivered

WP 5 : Price Proposal

8.1.Total price :

All the Price Proposal shall be separately submitted being sealed.

Note :

The prices which are used in the proposal to calculate the final total and break-down prices shall be

distinguished from the other prices (e.g. optionally suggested parts by the bidder or KARI, . . . ) by

marking a.p.(applied price) after the prices. In other words, the sum of a.p. shall be the final total

price proposed in the proposal.

The total price is the sum of the break down prices hereafter.

APPENDIX

1. General Terms and Conditions